Thinking About the Future of Libraries
I’ve gone to a couple of library conferences while I was away from you dear reader and I find that talk about the future of libraries is on the rise again. But, then again, aren’t people involved in libraries ALWAYS concerned about their future? Radio was going to kill books. Video Tapes were going to kill books. The Internet was going to kill books and now e-books are going to kill paper books. And therefore no libraries? Apparently the use for a library is in the eye of the beholder. Is it a place to check out books? A place to cull research? A place for community gatherings? A place to play video games? A place with free Internet access? I say yes, and then some.
Where is the Marketing?
I think the future is in the essence of the library as a “free” entity (I know our tax dollars pay for the public ones and tuition helps pay for the academic…you know what I meant). There are no favorites in the library, you can have whatever you want and take part in all kinds of activities, for free. It is true that when many people hear the word “library” they think of a quiet shushy place for paper books and that is really where the problem lies. The fact is librarians have worked very hard to create new spaces that work into the communities need for items and activities that normally cost money. Who else does that for you these days? Seriously. The issue here is the lack of marketing acumin on the part of the librarians. I think that advocacy and marketing are two of the most important and least understood skills a librarian can have.
Reading From the Screen
Here is the thing with the e-books. I was gifted a Kindle. So now I have one. I find I prefer the e-ink technology to the back lit color jobs for long stints of reading. But I digress, it is now easy for me to get a book at the click of a button. That’s even easier than dragging myself all the way to the public library. Problem, I have to pay for every book, averaging $9.99 a pop (even when a paperback copy is going for $5 or less). Problem, Amazon doesn’t have everything I want (e.g. Ray Bradbury is not having anything to do with e-books). Problem, I have to remember to plug it in from time to time (granted that is about once every two weeks but it is an issue and that sucker takes a good many hours to charge). Problem, it is not compatible with the free library software so I can’t borrow any of their books. Overarching problem, my Kindle costs $189 not every age needs to be responsible for that kind of equipment and not every household can afford to get one for every member of the family. Without paper books do we have to pick and choose who in our family get the opportunity to read? Until e-book readers become throw away technology that has easy (let’s focus on the word easy) access to free material, I just don’t see it killing the paper book.
So where does this leave libraries? The users needs are definitely shifting, or rather, expanding. And I think it is simply that. We need to be in touch with our patron (or those that we would like to be our patrons) and give them what they need for free. We need to let them know that these services exist. They need access to a number of things both technological and personal we should build from there. Am I missing something?
December 2, 2010 at 11:53 am
Generally speaking, I’m not sure that librarians are prepared for print technology no longer being the preferred medium for storing texts, let along text no longer being the preferred format for communicating information.
However, I can’t really blame us, largely because no one knows what exactly is going to replace print and text or how long each new technology is going to be used. Our systems for storing, sharing, and making books available WORK. When I’m thinking about the future, it is easy to downplay this, but it is difficult to give up something that works for something that is being worked out. A great example of this is our local consortium’s transition from individual catalogs to web-scale discovery. The new tool is desperately needed, but it doesn’t work as well on a day-to-day basis as the traditional MARC-based ILS.
Anyway, thanks for raising the question. I think we all need to ponder it. Print and text based information storage is going to be obsolete, if it isn’t already. We just don’t know what will replace them. It’s a hell of a challenge trying to decide when to replace something that works and we understand with an experimental gamble on what we will need five years from know, but if we don’t we can be certain that we’ll be obsolete in that same 5 years.
January 5, 2011 at 11:00 am
[…] Death of the Library. You think? The Animated Librarian Blog, December 2, 2010 […]